<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MacTheWeb &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mactheweb.com/archives/catagories/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mactheweb.com</link>
	<description>Mac and the Web - Perfect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:45:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cure Your Poor Engine Placement Blues</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/seo/cure-your-poor-engine-placement-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://mactheweb.com/seo/cure-your-poor-engine-placement-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/seo/cure-your-poor-engine-placement-blues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got ranking woes? There are no shortcuts to building your page rank. You can advertise but doing so won&#8217;t help a lot if your site isn&#8217;t search engine friendly. Get ranking the right way. Here&#8217;s a brief overview of steps you can take right now that will help solve your problems.
Content Building
Provide Interesting Content
Why should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got ranking woes? There are no shortcuts to building your page rank. You can advertise but doing so won&#8217;t help a lot if your site isn&#8217;t search engine friendly. Get ranking the right way. Here&#8217;s a brief overview of steps you can take right now that will help solve your problems.</p>
<h2>Content Building</h2>
<h3>Provide Interesting Content</h3>
<p>Why should I link to you if your site doesn&#8217;t have anything for me? Give me some reason to come back to your site and I may post a link to it. If all you offer is self-promotion I may visit once. If you can answer real questions about your product or services, if you can give me useful information about something related to your field that isn&#8217;t just marketing speak, then you will be worth linking to.</p>
<h3>Add More Content</h3>
<p>Do you sell blue widgets and red widgets? Rather than have a color selector, why not create two different product pages (linked to each other, of course). Use customized titles and text for each. For example, you could use the following page titles:</p>
<ul>
<li>Blue Widget &#8211; Make Your Vacuum Work Better.</li>
<li>Red Widget &#8211; Supercharge Your Hoover</li>
</ul>
<p>Doing so will help you rank better for both specific terms, rather than a single, more general term. Specific terms tend to convert to sales better than more general terms.</p>
<h3>Provide New Content</h3>
<p>If visited your site a couple of months ago and remember it you&#8217;ve done a good initial job. If the content hasn&#8217;t changed or been added to then you are now less interesting. Visitors see you that way. Search engines rank you that way. If you want a good search engine ranking keep your site current.</p>
<h3>Use Better Page Titles</h3>
<p>Got a term you&#8217;re trying to rank for? Make sure it&#8217;s in your page title. In most keyword spaces, this step alone will get noticeably improve your ranking. For competitive terms, you&#8217;ll need to do more. If your page title is generated from a content management system or shopping cart that fills your page titles with lots of strange symbols. Change systems. Titles should make sense to people. If they do, search engines will have no problem with them.</p>
<h3>Structure Your Content</h3>
<p>Notice how this article uses headings to define page sections? Search engines love that style of writing. The more you properly use heading tags, especially if you include keywords in them, the better. These are real heading tags, h1, h2, h3, etc. and not just bold or styled text. Think outline structure.</p>
<h2>Link Building Strategies</h2>
<p>If nobody links to you Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc. will not give you a good ranking. It&#8217;s the sad but simple truth. The fastest way to get added to the index is to get links from already established websites that are related to your industry but aren&#8217;t direct competitors. Here are some low cost methods of building links. They all involve time and writing but have the advantage of being free.</p>
<h3>Post Blog Comments</h3>
<p>My favorite way to build inbound links is to comment intelligently on related blog posts. Most blog comment forms allow you to enter a URL. Enter yours, and then say something witty or insightful about the blog post. Don&#8217;t re-post your link, or include any spammy promotional messages.</p>
<p>Give yourself plenty of time, and try to post at least ten comments per week. Some blogs use the nofollow attribute, so some comments won&#8217;t be counted &#8212; but if you post something intelligent, the blogger might just blog about you in their next post. Participate in Message Boards</p>
<h3>Participate in Forums</h3>
<p>Find several forums that are related to your business or organization. Most message forums allow you to include links in your signature that appears below every post. As with blog comments, don&#8217;t post promotional messages. Just participate in the community and be a positive and helpful voice. I&#8217;ve not only built my search engine rankings that way, I&#8217;ve gotten clients who see me as an expert.</p>
<h3>Write Articles</h3>
<p>Many websites are actively looking for people to contribute high quality content. You probably won&#8217;t get paid but you will be able to include your site address in your byline. Publish enough and you will start to be recognized as an expert in your field and people will come to your site to learn from you. If they like what they see they will often link to it.</p>
<h2>Do Your Keyword Homework</h2>
<p>An entire industry has arisen around keyword research. Some of the people in it will actually be worth the high rates they charge. Many won&#8217;t. Keyword research is not rocket science. Read some articles. Pick up a book. Visit <a href="http://wordtracker.com/">Wordtracker</a>. Read sites like <a href="http://www.searchengineguide.com/beal/2003/0205_ab1.html">Search Engine Guide</a>,  <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog">seomoz</a>, <a href="http://www.highrankings.com/articles.htm">High Rankings Advisor</a>,  and <a href="http://www.traffick.com/">Traffick</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also more likely to rank in the critical top three positions if you target more specific terms. According to a recent eyetracking study from Eyetools, visibility declines rapidly beyond beyond the top three listings. The number 10 spot, for instance, is only seen 20% of the time.</p>
<p>In other words, if your keyword is searched 100 times, and you&#8217;re in position 10 in the SERP, your link is only seen 20 times.</p>
<h2>Use Cleaner Code</h2>
<p>Load time influences how search engines crawl your site. Bloated pages filled with presentational tags and nested tables hurt you. Inline JavaScript and CSS can hurt you. Content that can only be viewed via JavaScript will hurt you.</p>
<ul>
<li>HTML tables that aren&#8217;t specifically for tabular data, should be removed in favor of lighter-weight CSS layout.</li>
<li>CSS should be stored in a separate file and linked with the link element.</li>
<li>JavaScript should be <a href="http://onlinetools.org/articles/unobtrusivejavascript/">Unobtrusive JavaScript</a>, which will leave your content accessible and searchable under all conditions, and should be stored in a separate file and linked with the script element.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Make Sure That All Content is Accessible</h3>
<p>If you have images, the alt tag is a great place to insert keyword rich descriptions of your images. If you use JavaScript, make sure that all your content is still accessible, which also means searchable.</p>
<h3>Fix Common Mistakes</h3>
<p>Be sure you&#8217;re not making any of the most common SEO mistakes. In particular, make sure you have text navigation (you can overlay graphics for style-aware browsers), and that your critical keyword-loaded content isn&#8217;t buried in flash objects that search engines might struggle to digest. Make sure that your code validates. Broken code might display fine but make stop the search engine from fully indexing your pages.</p>
<h3>Flash</h3>
<p>Use Flash only to provide real value to your visitors. There are good reasons to use Flash, but most of the Flash I see is not necessary, and hurts both rankings and usability. If you do need Flash make sure that your designer knows how to incorporate accessibility into your movies or at least provide alternative content that search engines can read.</p>
<h2>Don&#8217;t</h2>
<ul>
<li>Use automated site submit services. This can actually get your site red flagged, and delay your rankings.</li>
<li>Add your site to link farms. Such links can also hurt you.</li>
<li>Spam &#8212; people, blogs, forums, or search engines.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mactheweb.com/seo/cure-your-poor-engine-placement-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google efforts reasonable against click fraud</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/internet-facts/google-efforts-reasobable-against-click-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://mactheweb.com/internet-facts/google-efforts-reasobable-against-click-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/internet-facts/google-efforts-reasobable-against-click-fraud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In February 2005, Google, Yahoo, and Time Warner. were sued by Laneâ€™s Gifts &#38; Collectibles in a class-action lawsuit over click fraud. The company alleged that Google and the other companies had been improperly billing for pay-per-click ads that were not viewed by legitimate potential customers. The case was settled earlier this year and as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In February 2005, Google, Yahoo, and Time Warner. were sued by Laneâ€™s Gifts &amp; Collectibles in a class-action lawsuit over <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Click_fraud">click fraud</a>. The company alleged that Google and the other companies had been improperly billing for pay-per-click ads that were not viewed by legitimate potential customers. The case was settled earlier this year and as part of the settlement Google agreed to have an independent expert examine their click fraud detection methods, policies, and procedures and make a determination of whether or not they were reasonable measures to protect advertisers. The expert was <a href="http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~atuzhili/">Alexander Tuzhilin</a>, a Professor of Information Systems at NYU. While not entirely satisfied with Google&#8217;s system, he states, &#8220;I conclude that Google&#8221;s efforts to combat click fraud are reasonable.&#8221;</p>
<p>A <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Tuzhilin_Report.pdf">46 page pdf version of the report is available for reading</a></p>
<p>A summary and analysis of his report has been posted in the <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060725-135832">Search Engine Watch blog</a></p>
<p>Tuzhilin conludes with:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>â€œGoogle has built the following four &#8220;lines of defense&#8221; against invalid clicks: pre-filtering, online filtering, automated offline detection and manual offline detection, in that order. Google deploys different detection methods in each of these stages: the rule-based and anomaly-based approaches in the pre-filtering and the filtering stages, the combination of all the three approaches in the automated offline detection stage, and the anomaly-based approach in the offline manual inspection stage. This deployment of different methods in different stages gives Google an opportunity to detect invalid clicks using alternative techniques and thus increases their chances of detecting more invalid clicks in one of these stages, preferably proactively in the early stages.</p>
<p>Since its establishment in the Spring and Summer of 2003 the Click Quality team has been developing an infrastructure for detecting and removing invalid clicks and implementing various methods in the four detection stages described above. Currently, they reached a consolidation phase in their efforts, when their methods work reasonably well, the invalid click detection problem is &#8220;under control,&#8221; and the Click Quality team is fine-tuning these methods. There is no hard data that can actually prove this statement. However, indirect evidence provided in this report supports this conclusion with a moderate degree of certainty. The Click Quality team also realizes that battling click fraud is an arms race, and it wants to stay &#8220;ahead of the curve&#8221; and get ready for more advanced forms of click fraud by developing the next generation of online filters.</p>
<p>In summary, I have been asked to evaluate Google&#8221;s invalid click detection efforts and to conclude whether these efforts are reasonable or not. Based on my evaluation, I conclude that Google&#8221;s efforts to combat click fraud are reasonable.â€ </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mactheweb.com/internet-facts/google-efforts-reasobable-against-click-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Engine Optimization for Dummies &#8211; book review</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/book-reviews/search-engine-optimization-for-dummies-a-book-review/</link>
		<comments>http://mactheweb.com/book-reviews/search-engine-optimization-for-dummies-a-book-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/book-reviews/search-engine-optimization-for-dummies-a-book-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization for Dummiesby Peter Kent
Search engine optimization (SEO) is something vital to consider when you build a website if you ever expect people to find you through Google, Yahoo, MSN Search, Dogpile or any search engine. There is no rocket science involved and the methods and SEO rules are pretty straightforward, at least [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/?pp_album=1&#038;pp_image=seo_for_dummies.jpg" title="Search Engine Optimization for Dummies by Peter Kent" target="_top"><img src="http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/wp-content/photos/seo_for_dummies.jpg" width="105" height="105" alt="Search Engine Optimization for Dummies by Peter Kent" align="left" /></a><cite>Search Engine Optimization for Dummies</cite><br />by Peter Kent</p>
<p>Search engine optimization (<abbr title="search engine optimization">SEO</abbr>) is something vital to consider when you build a website if you ever expect people to find you through Google, Yahoo, MSN Search, Dogpile or any search engine. There is no rocket science involved and the methods and <abbr title="search engine optimization">SEO</abbr> rules are pretty straightforward, at least at the basic levels. If you want to make your site more search engine friendly, <cite>Search Engine Optimization for Dummies</cite> in an excellent introduction to the subject. Peter Kent writes with clarity, humor, and a very matter-of fact style. And, the humor is not insultingly geeky as it is in some Dummies books.</p>
<p><span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>Will this book make you an overnight success? No. Search Engine Optimization is work. To play at the highest levels you will need to pay very close attention to a number of factors and tweak your site often. But <cite>Search Engine Optimization for Dummies</cite> will take you a long way and give you a solid, easy-to-understand, foundation. </p>
<p>The book focuses on building search engine friendliness into your site, and gives full strategies regarding keyword analysis, site structure, page rank, link building and more. Included in the text is a brief explanation of Pay Per Click marketing as well as Pay Per Inclusion search engines. The book also includes links to many useful websites that explain certain issues further, as well as  to free applications that can help in the time consuming task of search engine optimization.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>In a quickly changing field, specifics can become out of date. To keep you current there is a companion website to <cite>Search Engine Optimization for Dummies</cite>, that seems frequently updated. And, a lot of the methods that Peter Kent outlines are just good site planning an building sense that will never go out of date.</p>
<p>Before you try the &#8220;can&#8217;t miss&#8221; <abbr title="search engine optimization">SEO</abbr> trick, which may actually hurt your ranking, or pay a lot of money to a <abbr title="search engine optimization">SEO</abbr> firm, buy this book. Read it. Do what it says. Benefit. Then if you still need an outside consultant you will be an informed consumer, much more likely to find an effective expert and much more likely to save a ton of money.</p>
<p>Clarity of writing: 5<br />
Timeliness: 3+<br />
Value for Money: 5</p>
<p>Highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mactheweb.com/book-reviews/search-engine-optimization-for-dummies-a-book-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Standards Improve Google Ranking</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a lot of so-called web designers don&#8217;t know, or know about and don&#8217;t pay attention to is a set of best practices for building websites published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and promoted by the Web Standards Project (WaSP). Here&#8217;s what WaSP has to say on the subject:
The World Wide Web Consortium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/?pp_album=1&amp;pp_image=webstandards.png" title="Web Standards Project" target="_top"><img src="http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/wp-content/photos/webstandards.png" width="105" height="103" alt="Web Standards Project" align="left" /></a>What a lot of so-called web designers don&#8217;t know, or know about and don&#8217;t pay attention to is a set of best practices for building websites published by the <a href="w3c.org">World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)</a> and promoted by the <a href="http://webstandards.org">Web Standards Project (WaSP)</a>. Here&#8217;s what WaSP has to say on the subject:</p>
<blockquote><p>The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) , along with other groups and standards bodies, has established technologies for creating and interpreting web-based content. These technologies, which we call â€œweb standards,â€ are carefully designed to deliver the greatest benefits to the greatest number of web users while ensuring the long-term viability of any document published on the Web. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><span id="more-27"></span></p>
<p>The simple truth is that you can build web sites that ignore web standards and they will probably display just fine in most web browsers. A common conception is that if the page looks fine it&#8217;s not worth the extra trouble to make it standards compliant. That&#8217;s even true, as far as it goes. That is, it&#8217;s true if you don&#8217;t care about your search engine page ranking. Creating standards complaint page is more work, but cutting corners typically creates an inferior product. That&#8217;s true with web pages too.</p>
<p>Another truth is that Google prefers pages the are standards compliant and well structured. Since it&#8217;s most likely your website is a marketing tool, don&#8217;t you want it to actually work? To see if your pages are well  are is a simple process. Just enter your page address in the <a href="http://validator.w3.org/">W3C Validation Service page</a>. </p>
<p>According to web marketing guru <a href="http://www.internetmarketingsecrets.com/">Michael Campbell</a> fixing his site to W3C standards caused up to a 27% more of his pages to be listed in Google. Now that&#8217;s worthwhile.</p>
<p>The full text of his newsletter article has been re-posted in <a href="http://www.brianrobinson.com/2005/09/how_to_get_up_to_27_more_pages_1.html">Brian Robinson&#8217;s blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
