Skip to content

great web hosting with Dreamhost


Get MTW by Email

Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz


  • Syndicate RSS 2.0
  • Syndicate with Atom

Creative Commons License

Blog Directory - Add Link

NoSpec!

Feedburner!

Performancing

Blog Directory

get camino browser

GeoURL


Love and hate in Macland

lovehateJohn Gruber and Mark Pilgrim have been carrying out one of the more thoughtful and well written discussions I’ve seen about the relative merits of the Mac OS and Open Source, specifically Ubuntu Linux. Mark, who is a real Mac expert has finally gotten fed up with dealing with a proprietary operating system and some of the arbitrary changes that we end users have to swallow. His strongest reasons have to do with Apple’s use of closed formats and the fact that he has lost some of his work when old formats were abandoned.

I’m totally in agreement with him there. John counters that the Mac OS is a better tool, more elegant, more polished and easier to use. Again I find myself in total agreement. That’s why I’m using a Mac right now, even though like most Mac web designers, I also have a Windows Box. I even have a copy of Yellow Dog Linux on an old iMac that I play with occasionally.

Back to John’s position regarding Open Source and open standards. I sometimes resent that Macs are so much more elegant and easy to use. Like him I’m pretty pissed off that Apple decided to change Mail’s storage format from mbox to an Apple proprietary format. I want my email to be my email, portable and accessible on any computer I chose to use.

Yes, I can use a different email client than Mail. I use Thunderbird on Windows. But it is a more polished product on Windows. And, it doesn’t integrate with Apple Services, Address Book and a couple of other products I’ve become dependent on. Apple claims that the reason for the change was to better integrate with Spotlight. Yet Spotlight seem able to access any text based file, which mbox most certainly is. I laugh at most conspiracy theories, yet I’ve come to believe that the format change was a lock-in decision, to make abandoning Macs more difficult.

The simple fact is that I mostly love Apple products but dislike Apple’s high-handed policies. I guess that is to be expected with a CEO like Steve Jobs who holds incredibly high standards and is absolutely tyrannical about things happening his way.

So I really have a love/hate relationship with Apple. A couple of years ago my old G3 tower finally died and I spent about four months running Windows as my main OS. It’s not that I love Microsoft more than Apple. Each seems to be run by megalomaniacs. One wants to control all of the worlds computers. The other wants to completely control the end user’s experience. Perhaps that’s what’s necessary to be successful at the level these men have reached. It doesn’t make me loyal to their products from any personal sense of admiration for the individuals.

Anyway, I bought another Mac because using Windows was just too slow and clunky. Windows Explorer totally frustrated me. But even that wasn’t as bad as endlessly telling the computer through multiple confirmation dialog boxes that, yes, I really do want to do what I want to do, got to me. I gave up and got an iBook.

I thought of going with Linux. My sympathies and basic inclinations are for Open Source Software but I’m not willing to give up the elegance, ease of use, and polish of a Macintosh and OS X.

However, as much as I admire its philosophy, Linux isn’t as easy to use as OS X. And, the iBook is an excellent computer that has performed reliably. Mac OS X is such a relief to use after Windows XP. An Linux would have been more frustrating still.

Yet, I sometimes feel trapped with Macs. It’s like loving a particular restaurant even though I know the chef is a total tyrant and bully. I feel addicted, having experienced withdrawal symptoms when I didn’t have my Mac for four months. And Linux is so clunky. The desktop software, Firefox and Thunderbird excluded, mostly consists of more inelegant knockoffs of inelegant Windows programs. I actually feel a mild revulsion at the thought of having to work with such a primitive and inconsistent interface.

I have Linux using friends who still use emacs and are proud of it. But for me a computer is a tool not and end in itself. I need to produce content. Lots of content, day in and day out. I no longer care to spend months mastering a (expletive deleted) text editor. I want to write. I want to code. I want to edit images. And for better of worse, the Mac still makes doing those things faster and easier than Open Source Software. I even wish I had the intestinal fortitude that Mark Pilgrim shows and could let go of my elegant tool. Alas, I don’t and can’t.


Possibly related:

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Peter  |  June 19th, 2006 at 11:16 am

    I’m not an expert on these things, but what do you do when the “standards” can’t handle things you want to do efficiently?

    This isn’t a great example, and I’m sure I’m wrong, but suppose the standard mail format starts to slow down dramatically after, say, 2000 messages? Should Apple just throw up it’s hands and say, “Sorry folks, nothing we can do. Use multiple mailboxes.” Or should they change their file format to efficiently deal with >2000 message mailboxes?

    Also, if the argument is that you can’t transfer messages out of Mail, why not write an AppleScript to do it?

  • 2. michael  |  June 19th, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    I seriously doubt that it is the mbox format that made mail slow. I get my mail on both Thunderbird on Windows and Mail on the Mac. Despite my Gateway being generally slower than my iBook, Thunderbird has never slowed down, even with close to 5000 mails. For most of its life Mail has been pretty flaky for me. I don’t buy the rationalization.

    Besides, the point is not about Mail. It’s about having portable data. If only Mail will read Mail’s archives, then my information is not totally mine, but only available if I can read it in Mail on a current version of Mac OS X.

    There are Applescripts to convert Mail archives and weirdkid software makes a conversion program. But some of the formatting is altered in in the conversion. So only an approximation of my email is available.

    It’s not just Mail. I no longer save anything in .doc or .awk format but rtf. I’d use HTML if the automatic conversion didn’t create such a mess. Unless I need the included calculations, I save spreadsheets as csv files. I convert my camera raw files to tiff for archiving.

    After too many instances of having to translate files, inevitably losing some formatting in the process, I’m more and more leary of closed formats that will need to be translated the next time some CEO decides that he needs to force upgrade sales by changing a file format.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed