<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Standards Improve Google Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/</link>
	<description>Mac and the Web - Perfect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOContest2008 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; W3C Code Validation is NOT Important in Search Engine Ranking</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-55055</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOContest2008 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; W3C Code Validation is NOT Important in Search Engine Ranking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/?p=27#comment-55055</guid>
		<description>[...] Based on personal experience, my answer would be no. I have seen many sites ranking so high with tons of validation errors. And also I have seen many sites no errors, and you get the green bar on W3C&#8217;s validation service and yet they are not ranking anywhere. If ever there is any benefit, it is not a major one and can be influenced by other factors. Although there are also other people stating that they see better ranking with valid code. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Based on personal experience, my answer would be no. I have seen many sites ranking so high with tons of validation errors. And also I have seen many sites no errors, and you get the green bar on W3C&#8217;s validation service and yet they are not ranking anywhere. If ever there is any benefit, it is not a major one and can be influenced by other factors. Although there are also other people stating that they see better ranking with valid code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthy Lifestyle Features</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/seo/web-standards-improve-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-50422</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthy Lifestyle Features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsdesigns.com/mactheweb/?p=27#comment-50422</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Healthy Lifestyle Features...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Healthy Lifestyle Features&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

