<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is BBEdit worth the price?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/</link>
	<description>Mac and the Web - Perfect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:23:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mac Web Design &#187; MacTheWeb &#187; BBEdit 8.5 a major upgrade</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-22365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Web Design &#187; MacTheWeb &#187; BBEdit 8.5 a major upgrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-22365</guid>
		<description>[...] A while ago I wondered publicaly if BBEdit was worth the high price of $200 that Bare Bones Software was charging. It appears that I was not alone in my thinking. A new version of BBEdit came out this week that not only offers new features but comes with a new lower price tag of $125. The upgrade price dropped too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while ago I wondered publicaly if BBEdit was worth the high price of $200 that Bare Bones Software was charging. It appears that I was not alone in my thinking. A new version of BBEdit came out this week that not only offers new features but comes with a new lower price tag of $125. The upgrade price dropped too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I am sticking with version 7 until something really compelling comes along.   I think they took their cue from Apple on this--charging full price for an upgrade, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sticking with version 7 until something really compelling comes along.   I think they took their cue from Apple on this&#8211;charging full price for an upgrade, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margo Esquandolas</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Margo Esquandolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I agree with Fred, and would add that if my project involves other apps, I&#039;m as likely as not to use Automator instead... or, if no other apps maybe just TextFactory inside BBEdit... but no matter how sliced BBEdit&#039;s automation makes it cheap at twice the price. 

If you just use the grep, then maybe you are a TextWrangler person. There are several things I didn&#039;t know would save me so much time until BBEdit put them in, so there&#039;s the &quot;staying on top of things&quot; part that I use but isn&#039;t a feature. I use the HTML palette, the glossaries, the preview server particularly for heavily templated stuff, the scripting (in all three forms)...

for a tool I use every day, slicing up two digits is slicing things too thin... plus there&#039;s real documentation... besides, there are other price points, about 1/2 price for the paying-attention discount crossgrade price, or about 1/4 price for students/teachers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Fred, and would add that if my project involves other apps, I&#8217;m as likely as not to use Automator instead&#8230; or, if no other apps maybe just TextFactory inside BBEdit&#8230; but no matter how sliced BBEdit&#8217;s automation makes it cheap at twice the price. </p>
<p>If you just use the grep, then maybe you are a TextWrangler person. There are several things I didn&#8217;t know would save me so much time until BBEdit put them in, so there&#8217;s the &#8220;staying on top of things&#8221; part that I use but isn&#8217;t a feature. I use the HTML palette, the glossaries, the preview server particularly for heavily templated stuff, the scripting (in all three forms)&#8230;</p>
<p>for a tool I use every day, slicing up two digits is slicing things too thin&#8230; plus there&#8217;s real documentation&#8230; besides, there are other price points, about 1/2 price for the paying-attention discount crossgrade price, or about 1/4 price for students/teachers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Your point is well taken Fred,

The last time I had to do an extensive AppleScripted project I used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tex-edit.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tex-Edit Plus&lt;/a&gt;. I didn&#039;t even think of BBEdit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point is well taken Fred,</p>
<p>The last time I had to do an extensive AppleScripted project I used <a href="http://www.tex-edit.com/" rel="nofollow">Tex-Edit Plus</a>. I didn&#8217;t even think of BBEdit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Gans</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Gans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no comparision between the AppleScript support of BBEdit and TextMate. BBEdit not only has an extensive dictionary, it is also recordable! My company recently adapted thousands of pages to work with the new IE7 plugin requirements, by using BBEdit and AppleScript. It&#039;s worth the price difference alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no comparision between the AppleScript support of BBEdit and TextMate. BBEdit not only has an extensive dictionary, it is also recordable! My company recently adapted thousands of pages to work with the new IE7 plugin requirements, by using BBEdit and AppleScript. It&#8217;s worth the price difference alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris. 

It&#039;s not a matter of missing features. TextMate is a great editor. No argument. My point is that BBEdit used to be alone as the only polished professional programmers editor. (Alpha is powerful but verrrry clunky) With their monopoly position, Bare Bones could charge as much as the market would bear. With TextMate as competition, I&#039;m hoping that the price of BBEdit drops to something in the same ball park. 

I have 10 years of using BBEdit; anything else just isn&#039;t the same, whether it has comparable features or not. My preference for BBEdit could be just laziness on my part, not taking the time to relearn. Or it could be that different people produce best with different work flows. Or maybe I just like to bitch. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a matter of missing features. TextMate is a great editor. No argument. My point is that BBEdit used to be alone as the only polished professional programmers editor. (Alpha is powerful but verrrry clunky) With their monopoly position, Bare Bones could charge as much as the market would bear. With TextMate as competition, I&#8217;m hoping that the price of BBEdit drops to something in the same ball park. </p>
<p>I have 10 years of using BBEdit; anything else just isn&#8217;t the same, whether it has comparable features or not. My preference for BBEdit could be just laziness on my part, not taking the time to relearn. Or it could be that different people produce best with different work flows. Or maybe I just like to bitch. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactheweb.com/software-review/is-bbedit-worth-the-price/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>What features from BBEdit do you find missing in TextMate? (I know about some, but there are replacements for some that you may not be aware of; also, if it&#039;s something MacroMates isn&#039;t aware of, I&#039;m sure it could be added.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What features from BBEdit do you find missing in TextMate? (I know about some, but there are replacements for some that you may not be aware of; also, if it&#8217;s something MacroMates isn&#8217;t aware of, I&#8217;m sure it could be added.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
